Return to CIG


View All Publications

Go To Publication by Year:

View Publications by Topic:



Air Quality

Aquatic Ecosystems and Fisheries

Background Papers

Climate: Atmospheric Modeling

Climate: Coupled Atmosphere-Ocean Modeling

Climate: Diagnostics

Climate: Global Climate

Climate: Ocean Modeling

Climate: PNW Climate

Climate: Regional Climate Modeling

Coastal Ecosystems

Coastal Environments

Conservation Biology

Data Analysis and Sharing


Fact Sheets

Forecasts and Applications

Forest Ecosystems

Human Health

Hydrology and Water Resources


Integrated Assessment

Ocean Acidification


Program Documents

Science Advisory Reports

Societal Dimensions

Special Reports

Theses and Dissertations

View Publications by Author:

Search the Publication Abstracts:

Other CSES Links:

About CSES

CSES Personnel

Data / Links


Welcome to the publications directory for the Climate Impacts Group and the Climate Dynamics Group. Please contact the web administrator for assistance with any of these publications.

View: Abstract

Costs and benefits of stormwater management: Case study of the Puget Sound region

Visitacion, B., D.B. Booth, and A.C. Steinemann. 2009. Costs and benefits of stormwater management: Case study of the Puget Sound region. ASCE Journal of Urban Planning and Development 135(4):150-158, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2009)135:4(150)).


With rising expenses and scrutiny of storm-water programs, managers need information on costs and benefits to make rational funding decisions. Most, however, lack this basic information. This study sought to identify and quantify the economic and ecological costs of storm-water-related damage and storm-water-management programs, and to understand relationships between management activities and damage reduction. Data were collected from published agency budgets, damage assessments, and structured interviews with storm-water managers. We focused on a single region, the Puget Sound region of Washington State, where storm-water issues abound and annual storm-water expenditures average about $100/capita. Benefits of storm-water management, primarily avoided damages, were presumed to exceed expenditures, but most jurisdictions have not systematically evaluated program effectiveness. Moreover, ecological damage from storm water is significant but commonly neglected in funding decisions. Results indicate the need to (1) evaluate the effectiveness of storm-water-management expenditures; (2) consider nonmonetary and ecological impacts in management and funding decisions; (3) explore preventive measures that can be less costly than remediation; and (4) increase public awareness of storm-water problems to support objective funding decisions.